Tour de Wrangs vii

De wielerunie UCI wil antwoorden op vragen als waarom urine uit 1999 getest werd in dat Franse dopinglab, en hoe het mogelijk is dat die anonieme stalen gekoppeld werden aan Lance Amstrong.

  • Who commissioned and directed this research and who agreed to the public dissemination of the results?
  • How could this be done without the riders’ consent?
  • Why was the UCI not informed?
  • How is it that the journalist apparently received WADA’s official reaction on the possibility of continuing the research with the remaining urine samples, and on possible sanctions, on 22 August (see l’Equipe’s article of 23 August), when WADA apparently received the information on these results only on 24 August?
  • The dissemination of the results being a breach of WADA’s anti-doping code, did WADA itself authorise this step?
  • Has this apparent research on the 1999 Tour de France been widened to other sports events in France in the same year (Roland Garros, football World Cup) – why was the Tour de France chosen?

Zie het hele dossier Lance Armstrong


[x]#1407 fan zaterdag 10 september 2005 @ 10:00:00